Ryan Anderson and Robert George call for the overturning of Roe v. Wade and naturally use all the legal and rhetorical tricks you would expect. The language is loaded - a fetus is "an unborn person in the womb" in need of "protection," an abortion is "the elective killing of unborn children" and their arguments are based on constitutional precedent and wrapped up in the jargon familiar to opponents of a woman's right to decide what to do with her body. In fact nowhere in their article is there the reference to a woman's right to control her own body. The implication is that men must do it for them. They are men and men don't have babies but have the right to make as many women pregnant as they desire and to make important decisions for women. Women are vehicles after all for men's precious sperm! They claim that the text of the Constitution does not "confer the right to abortion." The Constitution didn't include the right of slaves or women to vote either but we managed somehow to get past that. Perhaps we need an amendment which clearly states women have a Constitutional right to decide what to do to with their own bodies without interference from men.